Investing themes emerge as Andrew Scott crisscrosses North America


For the past month, Societe Generale head of cross-asset strategy & solutions for the U.S. Andrew Scott has been visiting clients from Montreal through to LA. He had the privilege of being a guest speaker at the Capstone Global Volatility Summit and most recently moderated a lively debate at Societe Generale’s quarterly macro dinner hosted in New York, all of which gave him access to many of the brightest risk-takers in macro and derivative markets.

Here are a couple prevailing themes he took away from listening to them.


Across multiple strategies, hedge fund performance (on average) has been poor in recent history. However, real money asset managers have also struggled, generally predicated on the fact that North American investors at large are not entirely sure which tail risk they should hedge. For the first time in several years, there is no consensus whatsoever regarding which direction markets will travel. Having surveyed multiple investors in Q1, there are an equal number who seemingly believe that markets could fall, do nothing or rally.

Indeed, this is one of the most poorly participated rallies of recent history. Very much like the US Dollar’s current predicament, investors might be begrudgingly long U.S. equities, but they have failed to find a credible alternative just yet, hence the desire to reduce longs at every opportunity, but never add.

Geographically, macro-Asia feels too leveraged to a trade deal and forget about owning European risk, where investor apathy is now bordering on disdain. Such sentiment toward Europe is broadly shared, and in all my career I have never observed such anemic desire to allocate risk to Europe from investors outside of Europe. Perhaps this is why European risk may finally present an interesting investment opportunity, because the world has given up on it!


Abandoning the Trans-Pacific Partnership was widely regarded as a key policy objective of the Trump administration on entry but getting the S&P above 3,000 would appear now to be one of the most important and well accepted policy goals despite continually going unsaid. It is for this reason that the majority of our North American clients (in stark contrast to Asian clients) believe that a U.S.-China trade-deal resolution is a mere formality. Thus, if this is already baked in to the price, then any suggestion of a deal break, or even unpalatable delay, would be extremely problematic for markets, meaning trade wars have now become an asymmetric risk to the downside.

Another political overhang with increasing momentum is the growing bi-partisan support now to minimize or even outlaw corporate share buybacks. It is a well-defined dynamic that buybacks (in excess of $4tn post-crisis in the S&P) have been responsible for the most stable and sizeable liquidity provision in U.S. equity markets. Therefore, in a world where this support is increasingly at risk, half the S&P is owned by passive tracking funds, and volatility control/risk parity/CTA funds are all at record assets under management; it is no surprise at all that some Chief Investment Officers believe that liquidity is their funds’ single largest market fear. Throw in the fact that we have never seen a crisis without proprietary trading desks acting as liquidity providers leads me to think that this is why a small, but growing, community of clients (N.B. despite its present illegality) feel that the Fed may become a forced buyer of U.S. stocks in the next downturn.

Unless otherwise stated, any views or opinions expressed herein are solely those of Andrew Scott and may differ from the views and opinions of others at, or other departments or divisions of, Societe Generale and its affiliates. No part of Andrew Scott’s compensation was, is or will be related, directly or indirectly to the specific views expressed herein. This material is provided for information purposes only and is not intended as a recommendation or an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or financial instrument. The information contained herein has been obtained from, and is based upon, sources believed to be reliable, but Societe Generale and its affiliates make no representation as to its accuracy and completeness. The views and opinions contained herein are those of the author of this material as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. Neither Andrew Scott nor Societe Generale has any obligation to update, modify or otherwise notify the recipient in the event any information contained herein, including any opinion or view, changes or becomes inaccurate. To the maximum extent possible at law, Societe Generale does not accept any liability whatsoever arising from the use of the material or information contained herein.

This publication should not be construed as investment research as it has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Therefore, even if it contains a research recommendation, it should be treated as a marketing communication. This publication is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence Societe Generale is required to have policies in place to manage the conflicts which may arise in the production of its research, including preventing dealing ahead of investment research.